![]() |
| A website supporting my switchingview YouTube Channel |
As you look across history at descriptions of homosexuality there seems to be no pattern to what is described, either in the reports of people's behaviour, or in society's attitudes to the behaviour.
The three videos in this theme are my attempt to make sense of this and find a way forward through the confusion.
Many gay people dislike the word homosexual because they believe the term was invented by doctors to describe pathological or abnormal behaviour. But this origin story is wrong. Like so much gay history the true story has been supressed by anti-gay prejudice.
The terms homosexual and heterosexual were created by Karl Maria Kertbeny writing to Karl Heinrich Ulrichs about Prussian law reform in 1868. This pair could be described as the first gay activists of the modern era. They used the word homosexual to describe an innate disposition, something inborn.
It was only 20 years later that doctors like Richard Kraft-Ebing took over the term and described homosexuality as pathological or abnormal. But even then gay scholars such as Edward Carpenter criticised Kraft-Ebing as being too influenced by his Eurocentric medical experience. Carpenter argued instead that homosexuality was "a phenomenon widespread through the human race and enduring in history", and should be seen as an entirely natural, healthy and valuable factor of human life.
In the video I will expand on this story and bring it up-to-date. I want to explain how unhelpful definitions of homosexuality have been imposed on us by straight people, and describe the more helpful definitions given to us by gay scholars.
There seems to be no stable pattern to descriptions of homosexuality in history. The behaviours and understandings vary from society to society. Some scholars use this to argue that homosexuality is not an innate human disposition but a learned/chosen behaviour, driven by the surrounding culture.
In this video I will be arguing against this by exploring two issues.
If your research into homosexualty only studies same-sex sex then you will get the wrong answers. But if you see homosexuality primarily as a supportive companionship, but a companionship reinforced by the sex, then the science falls into place. One can see how homosexuality may have an evolutionary benefit, and have developed as an innate factor in human life.
Much of the writing and scholarship about homosexuality looks only at what has happened within a western, Christian culture. Such scholarship appears not to care about the pre-patriarchal, pre-Christian stories of same-sex loving behaviour reported right across the world and right across history.
These are the stories I explore in great detail in my Intermediate Types and Queer Ministry themed videos.
This video is simply a short summary of that scholarship. It tells the story of how in past times, Intermediate Type (LGBTQ) people often lived openly within their society, and commonly they were were valued for their contributions in spirituality or warfare.
These same societies were often gender egalitarian, with men and women sharing authority and leadership. It is important to understand this gender egalitarian story. The two issues go hand-in-hand. Pre-patriarchal cultures in which a woman's status was valued had no problem valuing the status of homosexual or transgender people.
Sadly, a few thousand years ago, changes in technology led to the development of patriarchal cultures which adopted ideas around male dominance and the suppression of female and intermediate type freedom. These new patriarchal cultures developed slowly in Europe and Asia over 3-4000 years BCE, and were almost fully developed by the time of the late Roman Empire and its adoption of Christianity as the state religion. Homosexual lives were attacked and suppressed as patriarchy and Christianity diffused outwards.
Outside these areas however, in large parts of the Americas, India, Africa and Polynesia, these gender egalitarian and gay friendly cultures were unaffected. They were only wiped out by the imposition of patriarchal Christian doctrines during European colonial expansion in the 16th-20th Century.
This is a complex story, which entails bringing together scholarship from different academic areas:
Much of the scholarship is quite recent. For example research about matriarchy and biarchy has been transformed by gender DNA analysis of skeletons only possible for the last 10 years. Our attitudes to Colonial history are also changing rapidly as the "victims" of colonialism are empowered to give their side of the story.
If one pays attention to this developing scholarship it is possible to develop a much fuller history of homosexuality in the world. We can see how homosexuality and gender variance was widespread and valued right across pre-patriarchal history, and then how it was later suppressed, and the memory of these earlier cultures all but forgotten.
Finally, can I ask you a favour. I put a lot of work into these recordings, and it would be good if they can be seen by the largest number of people. If you have a friend or colleague who you think would benefit from knowing about these issues, please do pass it on. TELL A FRIEND! - SPREAD THE WORD!I would welcome comments and suggestions on this work - Contact Me. Thank You |